|
Variable Length Subnet Masks
Oct 12,2010 00:00
by
admin
| RFC
1009, 1987, specifies the procedures for using multiple subnet masks. This
technique is referred to as variable length subnet masks (VLSM). The term
VLSM can be confusing because the subnet mask for a specific network does not
vary but is fixed. VLSM means that the subnet masks for different subnets can
have unequal lengths. As an example, it would allow a subnet mask of
255.255.255.252 to be assigned to a serial link and 255.255.255.0 to an ethernet
network. Once the masks are assigned, however, they do not change, at least by
themselves. |
| |
 |
| |
Figure 2-6: VLSM example 1 |
|
 | |
 |
| |
The
VLSM technique is very useful for allocating IP addresses more efficiently (less
waste) and for reducing the size of routing tables. However, VLSM can also cause
a number of massive network headaches if not used properly. |
| |
 |
| |
VLSM Example 1 |
| |
 |
| |
Let’s apply VLSM to the network in Figure 2-5. Assume we have been
assigned the Class B network 156.26.0.0. The ethernet networks are assigned
addresses using a /24 subnet mask; we will use the first two networks with this
mask, 156.26.1.0 and 156.26.2.0. The third network, 156.26.3.0, will be
sub-subnetted using a /30 subnet mask, which will give us a possible 62
sub-subnets we can use for serial connections. Notice that we are subnetting an
already subnetted network, 156.26.3.0. Figure 2-6 illustrates this
technique. |
| |
 |
| |
Figure 2-6 visually represents the technique that should be used when
using VLSM. Start with the standard subnet mask (/8, /16, or /24 for Class A, B,
or C). Determine the network with the required maximum number of hosts, in this
case 254. Then subnet using a mask that will give you networks that can handle
the largest number of hosts you need. For smaller networks, sub-subnet the large
networks and keep going until you have satisfied your requirements. |
| |
 |
| |
VLSM Example 2 |
| |
 |
| |
The
best way to master a technique is practice, practice, practice, so here we go.
Given the IP network 202.128.236.0, design a network with the following
requirements: |
| |
 |
| |
|
•
Four networks with a maximum of 26 hosts |
| |
 |
| |
|
•
Three networks with a maximum of 10 hosts |
| |
 |
| |
|
•
Four point-to-point serial links |
| |
 |
| |
Starting with the greatest number of hosts per network, we can use a
/27 subnet mask to satisfy the first requirement. From Table
2-6, this gives us six networks
of 30 hosts each with two networks left over to sub-subnet. To satisfy the next
requirement, we can sub-subnet the two leftover /27 networks using a /28 subnet
mask to give us four networks with 14 hosts each. Finally, take one of the four
sub-subnetted networks and sub-sub-subnet using a /30 subnet mask. |
| |
 |
| |
How
did I arrive at the diagram in Figure 2-7? Let’s take a closer look as to where
these network numbers came from; then we’ll look at another VLSM design problem
to ensure that you have mastered the technique. |
| |
 |
| |
Figure 2-7: VLSM example 2 |
|
 | |
 |
| |
1. |
|
Determine the mask for the networks containing the greatest number of
hosts. |
| |
 |
| |
The
first requirement is for four networks with a maximum of 26 hosts. Using
Table 2-6, we need three subnet bits or a /27 subnet mask. The fourth octet of
our IP network would be segmented as |
| |
 |
| |
S S S H H H H H |
| |
 |
| |
where S S S indicates the subnet bits and H H H H H indicates the
host bits. The subnets then are |
| |
 |
| |
and
we are using subnets 96 through 192 for the networks containing 26 hosts because
these subnets can handle a maximum of 30 hosts. |
| |
 |
| |
2. |
|
Sub-subnet the subnetted networks as needed. |
| |
 |
| |
The
second requirement calls for three networks with a maximum of 10 hosts each.
Again, we consult Table 2-6 and see
that we need four subnet bits or a /28 subnet mask. We will sub-subnet network
202.128.236.32 and 202.128.236.64. The first three subnet bits are fixed with
the values 001 (subnet 32) and 010 (subnet 64), so now we have |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 1 S H H H H |
| |
 |
| |
Network 32 S can be 0 or 1, giving us |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 1 0 H H H H |
| |
 |
| |
Setting the host bits to 0, the sub-subnets are |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 = 32 |
| |
 |
| |
Applying the same procedure to subnet 64, we get |
| |
 |
| |
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 64 |
| |
 |
| |
3. |
|
To
satisfy the last requirement of four point-to-point serial links, we will
sub-sub-subnet sub-subnet 32, which now is equal to |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 1 0 S S H H |
| |
 |
| |
S S
can be either 0 0, 0 1, 1 0 , or 1 1 yielding |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 = 32 |
| |
 |
| |
As a
final task for this exercise, determine the range of hosts and the broadcast
addresses for networks 202.128.236.192, 202.128.236.80, and
202.128.236.40. |
| |
 |
| |
The
fourth octet of network 202.128.236.192 is |
| |
 |
| |
1 1 H H H H H H |
| |
 |
| |
and
the host bits can range from |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 0 0 0 1—1 1 1 1 1 0 |
| |
 |
| |
which gives us a range of |
| |
 |
| |
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 (193)—1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 (254) |
| |
 |
| |
The
broadcast address is determined by setting the host bits to 1, which
is |
| |
 |
| |
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5
255 |
| |
 |
| |
so
the broadcast address is 202.128.236.255. For network |
| |
 |
| |
Figure 2-8: Realization of VLSM example 2 |
|
 | |
 |
| |
202.128.236.80, the fourth octet contains |
| |
 |
| |
0 1 0 1 H H H H |
| |
 |
| |
so
the range of host addresses is |
| |
 |
| |
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 (81)—0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 (94) |
| |
 |
| |
and
the broadcast address is |
| |
 |
| |
0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 (95) |
| |
 |
| |
For
network 202.128.236.40, the fourth octet contains |
| |
 |
| |
0 0 1 0 1 0 H H |
| |
 |
| |
Because H H cannot be 0 0 or 1 1, the host addresses for this network
are 202.128.236.41 and 202.128.236.42 with a broadcast address of
202.128.236.243. The realization of this network design is shown in Figure
2-8. |
| |
 |
| |
For
the final VLSM example, design a network using the Class C address 200.100.50.0
that satisfies the following requirements: |
| |
 |
| |
|
•_Nine serial point-to-point links |
| |
 |
| |
|
•_Four networks with a maximum of 30 hosts |
| |
 |
| |
|
•_Three networks with a maximum of five hosts |
| |
 |
| |
Determine the address host ranges and the broadcast address for each
subnet. |
| |
 |
| |
From
Table 2-6, a 3-bit subnet mask will give us six networks of 30 hosts
each. |
| |
 |
| |
Subnet mask = 255.255.255.224 |
| |
 |
| |
Networks |
| |
 |
| Hosts |
| |
|
 |
| Broadcast Address |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.0 |
| |
 |
| 1—30 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.31 (if we use IP subnet-zero) |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.32 |
| |
 |
| 33—62 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.63 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.64 |
| |
 |
| 65—94 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.95 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.96 |
| |
 |
| 97—126 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.127 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.128 |
| |
 |
| 129—158 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.159 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.160 |
| |
 |
| 161—190 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.191 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.192 |
| |
 |
| 193—222 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.223 |
| |
|
 |
| |
One
solution is to use the first four networks to satisfy the requirement of four
networks with 30 hosts each. For the requirement of three networks with five
hosts each, we can sub-subnet network 200.100.50.160 using the 5-bit subnet mask
200.100.50.160/255.255.255.248, which gives us the networks listed
below. |
| |
 |
| |
Network |
| |
 |
| Hosts |
| |
|
 |
| Broadcast Address |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.160 |
| |
 |
| 161—166 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.167 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.168 |
| |
 |
| 169—174 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.175 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.176 |
| |
 |
| 177—182 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.183 |
| |
|
 |
| |
200.100.50.184 |
| |
 |
| 185—190 |
| |
|
 |
| 200.100.50.191 |
| |
|
 |
| |
We
can use any three of the four networks to satisfy the requirement of three
networks with five hosts. |
| |
|